We can perform less moves by checking for scenarios where aliasing
occurs. Since addition is commutative (usually, general-case anyway),
order of inputs doesn't strictly matter here.
In the event no source vectors alias the destination,
we can just move the first source vector into it and
then perform the divide without needing to move afterword.
We can avoid needing to use movprfx here by moving
directly into the destination when possible and just
doing the UMAX directly.
Also expands the unsigned max tests to test values with
the sign bit set to ensure all behavior is caught.
Since SMAX performs a comparison and returns the max value regardless
of how the operands are provided, we can check for when the second
input aliases the destination.
Removes the truncating move that we perform inside the StoreResult
function and instead delegates the responsibility to the instruction
implementations themselves.
This removes a lot of redundant moves that occur on 128-bit variants
of AVX instructions.
Also fixes a weird case where we were handling 128-bit SVE
in VBroadcastFromMem when we already have AdvSIMD instructions
that will perfom the zero-extension behavior for us.
These IR operations are required to support AFP's NEP mode which does
vector insert in to the destination register. Additionally it gives us
tracking information to allow optimizing out redundant inserts on
devices that don't support AFP natively.
In order to match x86 semantics we need to support binary and unary
scalar operations that do a final insert in to a vector. With optional
zeroing of the top 128-bits for AVX variants.
A tricky thing is that in binary operations this means that the
destination and first source have an intrinsically linked property
depending on if it is SSE or AVX.
SSE example:
- addss xmm0, xmm1
- xmm0 is both the destination and the first source.
- This means xmm0[31:0] = xmm0[31:0] + xmm1[31:0]
- Bits [127:32] are UNMODIFIED.
FEX's JIT jumps through some hoops so that if the destination register
equals the first source register, then it hits the optimal path the
AFP.NEP will insert in to the result. AVX throws a small wrench in to
this due to changed behaviour
AVX example:
- vaddss xmm0, xmm1, xmm2
- xmm0 is ONLY the destination, xmm1 and xmm2 are the sources
- This operation copies the bits above the scalar result from the
first source (xmm1).
- Additionally this will zero bits above the original 128-bit xmm
register.
- xmm0[31:0] = xmm1[31:0] + xmm2[31:0]
- xmm0[127:32] = xmm1[127:32]
- ymm0[255:127] = 0
This causes these instructions to support a fairly large table depending
on if the instruction is an SSE or AVX instruction, plus if the host CPU
supports AFP or not.
So while fairly complex, it's handling all the edge cases and gives us
optimization opportunities as we move forward. Currently on non-AFP
supporting devices this has a minor benefit that these IR operations
remove one temporary register, lowering the Register Allocation
overhead.
In the coming weeks I am likely to introduce an optimization pass that
removes redundant inserts because FEX currently does /really/ badly with
scalar code loops.
Needs #3184 merged first.
This allows us to use reciprocal instructions which matches precision of
what x86 expects rather than converting everything to float divides.
Currently no hardware supports this, and even the upcoming X4/A720/A520
won't support it, but it was trivial to implement so wire it up.
Suggested by Alyssa. Adding an IR operation can be a little tedious
since you need to add the definition to JIT.cpp for the dispatch switch,
JITClass.h for the function declared, and then actually defining the
implementation in the correct file.
Instead support the common case where an IR operation just gets
dispatched through to the regular handler. This lets the developer just
put the function definition in to the json and the relevent cpp file and
it just gets picked up.
Some minor things:
- Needs to support dynamic dispatch for {Load,Store}Register and
{Load,Store}Mem
- This is just a bool in the json
- It needs to not output JIT dispatch for some IR operations
- SSE4.2 string instructions and x87 operations
- These go down the "Unhandled" path
- Needs to support a Dispatcher function override
- This is just for handling NoOp IR operations that get used for
other reasons.
- Finally removes VSMul and VUMul, consolidating to VMul
- Unlike V{U,S}Mull, signed or unsigned doesn't change behaviour here
- Fixed a couple random handler names not matching the IR operation
name.
The motivation towards just having a pointer array in CpuState was that
initialization was fairly cheap and that we have limited space inside
the encoding depending on what we want to do.
Initialization cost is still a concern but doing a memcpy of 128-bytes
isn't that big of a deal.
Limited space in CpuState, while a concern isn't a significant one.
- Needs to currently be less than 1 page in size
- Needs to be under the architectural offset limitations of loadstore
scaled offsets. Which is 65KB for 128-bit vectors
Still keeps the pointer array around for cases when we would need
synthesize an address offset and it's just easier to load the
process-wide table.
The performance improvement here is removing the dependency in the
ldr+ldr chain. In microbenchmarks this has shown to have an improvement
of ~4% by removing this dependency chain on Cortex-X1C.
With the removal of the x86 JIT, there is no need to have these be
independent classes.
Merges the Arm64Dispatcher in to the base Dispatcher class.
No functional change, just moving code.
Mostly copypaste of Orlshl... we really should deduplicate this mess somehow.
Maybe a shift enum on the core Or op?
Signed-off-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@rosenzweig.io>
movprfx is invalid to use when the source register matches the movprfx
destination.
This was getting picked up on by `TwoByte/0F_D1.asm` now that RCLSE is
working better now.
Ever since we reordered registers in `X86Enums.h` this has silently been
broken. This wasn't hit because RCLSE has been broken ever since SRA was
added, so inlinesyscalls just weren't ever happening.
Quick fix while I think of a way to more strictly correlate these
registers so it doesn't happen again.
Originally this was going to use setf8/setf16, but it looks like the approach of
shift-and-test turns out to be faster. As a bonus this is a nice delete-the-code
win :-)
Signed-off-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@rosenzweig.io>
Add new synthetic condition codes that do an AND as their relational operator,
testing the result. This is 1 IR op for things like
(A & B) == 0 ? C : D
This can translate to
tst A, B
csel A, B, eq
In the future, if A is the NZCV register and B is a supported immediate, eg
(NZCV & 0x80000000) == 0 ? C : D
this will be able to translate to a single instruction with the appropriate
condition
csel A, B, pl
but that needs RA support.
Signed-off-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@rosenzweig.io>
This is blocking performance improvements. This backend is almost
unilaterally unused except for when I'm testing if games run on Radeon
video drivers.
Hopefully AmpereOne and Orin/Grace can fulfill this role when they
launch next year.
If we are going to throw away the updated value of CF anyway there is no point
wasting an instruction to invert CF. Add an IR toggle for that so the arm64 JIT
can make better choices.
Signed-off-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@rosenzweig.io>
Wide shifts under SVE use 64-bit source elements. If a smaller element
overlaps the 64-bit shift element then it uses that shift
eg:
- Src1[15:0] >> Shift[63:0]
- Src1[31:16] >> Shift[63:0]
- Src1[47:32] >> Shift[63:0]
- Src1[63:48] >> Shift[63:0]
- After this point it will switch to the next 64-bit shift element
- Src1[79:64] >> Shift[127:64]
- Src1[95:80] >> Shift[127:64]
- Src1[111:96] >> Shift[127:64]
- Src1[127:112] >> Shift[127:64]
As seen, we can skip the duplication of the scalar element if the OpSize
is 64-bit, this makes MMX emulation slightly more optimal here.
This also means that a few instructions that weren't claimed to be
optimal actually are since they need the duplication operation (which
vixl always labels as a mov).
Skips implementing it for the x86 JIT because that's a bit of a
nightmare to think about.
The ARM64 implementation requires sequential registers which means if
the incoming sources aren't sequential then we need to move the sources
in to the two vector temporaries. This is fine since we have zero-cycle
vector renames and the alternative is slower.
Lioncache